Wednesday, July 20, 2016

Good Neighbor???

 

Good Neighbor… North Miami? Think again.
 
Yesterday I, along with others had the distinct pleasure of spending most of our day downtown watching our County Government in action. And it was a 3 ring circus.
After sitting through, what seemed like countless hours of an endless stream of people pleading for more money for parks, the zoo, drug rehab centers and too many other groups to remember, we finally had our moment for consideration regarding our Annexation proposal. And it wasn’t pretty.
First, our Mayor was asked to speak on behalf of our proposal. Soon thereafter, the process was interrupted by the County Chair to bring up some delegation from Kenya to speak. Really? What? How was this in any way relevant to our agenda item, again after sitting for hours waiting just for this moment? I don’t know, but the Chair thought this was the proper time to wheel them out. After a time we tried to get back on track and had comments heard from both our Biscayne Park residents and staff. I didn’t keep count, but the majority of our people spoke honestly and openly about our needs and reasoning for annexation. The few who spoke against it, one... after spending all day waiting to be heard, simply bailed out of making any comment other than “yea, I agree with them” (or something to that effect) and the other spoke... outfitted in sandals. Remember I told you it was a circus? But the best was yet to come.
One of the North Miami Commissioners rose up, against the previous vote of BP support from her peers and council of their attorney to wail about the “injustice of it all.” But, wait... there’s more. The attorney (representing one of the commercial buildings) spewed misinformation to include that we were planning (or in the works of as he told it) the erection of an $800K wall adjoining the railroad tracks!! I kid you not. [ASIDE] I assume he conferred with G.R.R. Martin about the erection of such a structure [END ASIDE].

Of course, everyone wanted to get in on the action at this point... to include those who had no ties with either proposed area, but spoke just the same. And of course, there was no fact checking of their comments but hey, it’s a free for all at this point. Blood was in the water... our blood. And the sharks were all coming in to take their bite.
But the Big Tent went up with a bus load (yes, literally a full bus load) of people, decked out in their red anti-annex tee shirts (reportedly from the Advenir at Biscayne Shores property) leveraging the Commissioners with their dog and pony show. Who these people were and where they were picked up off the street remains a mystery.  One of our residents actually asked them what was going on and the answer was “I’m here to save our parks.”  Yup, that makes total sense. Thanks for playing.  And it was also reported, (and photographed) that they were all standing around in a group after the hearing receiving what I assume were their payment vouchers.
So, in this telling Goliath ruled the day and our annexation bid went up in smoke. What’s next remains to be seen.
 
Standing Watch-
Milton Hunter
The Biscayne Parker


16 comments:

  1. If we lost the vote - as they say - fair and square - I still wouldn't be happy but I could accept it. But - what we saw yesterday was pure contempt and disrespect for our community. The chairman of the county commission actually interrupted the discussion a 2nd time(while one county commissioner was giving her reasons for supporting our annexation bid) when he felt the need to give a shout out to a long ago retired NM police chief. His excuse was that he had failed to acknowledge that person. Well, if the chair had stayed in the room for the whole agenda item discussion he would have known that chief had already been acknowledged and spoke against us. As for the "red shirts" I have to wonder where whomever organized this sabotage found so many people who didn't have to go to work on a weekday. Through all this circus perhaps the most disappointing part was that it was obvious the county commissioners had their minds made up in advance. I can think of no other way to explain why there was no 2nd "for discussion". Obviously they were not interested in hearing or sharing their positions and didn't want to go on record with a vote. Pathetic, really pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Janey,
      You know they say "a picture speaks a thousand words?" Well, in this case they were right.

      Delete
  2. I would also like those in our community who were anti annexation to come up with some WORKABLE and REALISTIC ideas for increased revenues. And no, rezoning commercial or thinking some developer is going to build us an office bldg. for free and we get to collect the rents (yes, both of these have been mentioned!) are neither workable, nor realistic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's not get too far ahead of ourselves. I assume the appropriate time will come where we all need to sit down and have an honest and open conversation of what comes next.

      It would be nice to think that the anti-annexer's (new word here) would have some workable and realistic plans for how to increase our revenues and/or in how to decrease our expenses. We've asked before and found only crickets... but today is a new day.

      Delete
  3. Thanks for recapping this Milt.
    Before I make any comments I want to watch the video.
    I feel like we got kicked in the gut, it sure seemed like we got setup yesterday. I have more to say on this but for now to Janey's question, let's start with the four former commissioners that killed the idea in 2013 (Noah, Bryan and Barbara that voted to kill it and the one behind the scenes giving the orders), I want to hear some real world solutions from them for BP to raise revenue.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Chuck,
      Well, clearly it was satirical and meant as self-therapy. Cheaper than the couch...

      Delete
    2. I know it's easy to blame residents or commissioners who weren't in favor of annexation for its failure. It seems like the ones who weren't in favor were the big property owners who were going to have to pay a lot more in taxes. Giving financial motivation to county commissioners is nothing new and it happens on every level. It was always a bit optimistic and naive to think we would get the residents in the annexation area to vote yes and have all the county commissioners agree.

      Instead of playing the blame game, ask everyone, the "anti-annexers" and the "pro-annexers" to think of ways to either raise revenue or come up with ideas on how we can make the most of the revenue we have. Let's not turn this into a war. A lot more could be accomplished if we just worked together.

      Delete
    3. Sorry, I forgot Barbara's still a Commissioner.

      Delete
  4. I think it was a fool's errand to tackle the Village's fiscal shortcomings with the pipe dream of expecting property owners in the proposed annex region to agree to raise their millage rate to 9.7; the highest in Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties. We should be tackling how to live within our revenue stream and/or how to cut expenses first. Then the revenues generated from the annexed property owners would be gravy and could go to reducing any debt owned by the Village, installing sidewalks, and finally having a millage rate comparable with similar jurisdictions (i.e. El Portal, Normandy Shores).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chief,
      Welcome. We're going to request for you to use your full name as it may (and did) cause some confusion as to who you are and/or were representing. Please let me state for our readers that this poster is Not BP Chief "Rusty" McKenna.

      Thanks,
      Milt

      Delete
  5. Milt, thanks so much for making a very dry subject palatable! I thoroughly enjoyed your presentation.

    I was for annexation. I know there are problems attached to it being a reality, but aren't they with every decision? Would the annexed area population referendum be for it. I highly doubt it. I just WISH Biscayne Park could have a referendum. I'm jealous. (Tongue in cheek).

    So, what is next? An 800K wall. What are we, the border? Lol.
    I am in favor of sidewalks and speed bumps and garden clubs. I can only wish :)

    So now what IS next. I'm very curious what the plan will be to increase revenue. I have a feeling code enforcement is going to take a leading role in revenue, sadly. It is a disappointing thing to think that the motivation of code enforcement to collect fees is to increase revenue. It's necessary, but not in terms of revenue. It's supposed to be for improving BP.

    I am happy we finally have a new Village Manager. Much needed, indeed. Is she the candidate that has a lot of experience in code enforcement? I heard one of them had a great deal of work related experience. I hope so. in order for the squeaky wheel to be well lubricated. I think it's rusted out to say the least. But I digress.

    I don't pretend to be savy about Biscayne Park politics.

    Thanks again Milton :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Elona,

      Glad you enjoyed it. IMO, the motivation of code enforcement should be to enforce our codes, educate our residents and as such help to increase our investment in our homes. What's more important than that? I don't see it as fee driven. I do agree that code needs to take a leading role. We've got a long way to go before BP looks as good as it could... and mostly over small easy to fix problems.

      And yes, Sharon has loads of experience in code as she ran that department for Ft. Lauderdale. I think she'll be great in helping us get on track... and also think you'll like her. She has a wonderful energy and attitude. Be sure to stop by once she starts (Sept.) and get to know her.


      Delete
  6. Oh excellent! She is the one they have been talking about that knows code well. How wonderful for the Park. I know it sounds strange to be excited about someone who knows code, but code can either make or break a village like ours. It can improve it vastly. I want our code department not a place where people run from, but run to in order to help their property increase in value. Of course nobody likes to pay money for improvements and most people feel like they are being ripped off. The fact is code enforcement is a fact of life. As long as the department doesn't abuse their power it's a good thing. I hope everyone can develop a good working relationship with the code enforcement department and not run from it in a frenzy.

    By the way, who will introduce Sharon to the Neighbor app? I want to learn about her and get to know her. I hope she is like the police chief and is friendly and inviting. Lets try to get her to join and be inviting to her.

    Thanks

    Elona

    ReplyDelete
  7. Milt,
    For clarification on a prior comment, the Village of EL Portal Millage rate was 8.3 for the 2015-2016 budget and they have some Commercial properties. Normandy Shores is part of the City of Miami Beach. They are a separate taxing district and pay a 1 mill tax on top of the Miami Beach tax rate for a total of 6.9 mills.
    Milt, I think you should set a policy, no pseudonyms.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thought you might be interested in this minor sale that just took place.

    Chuck

    Alta Mira sold to Advenir for $52.7m
    Published at: 2016-06-21 16:53 | Author: CIJ USA
    A North Miami apartment complex, Alta Mira, has been sold to Aventura-based investment firm Advenir Inc. for $52.7 million. The 240-unit community, located at 12010 N.E. 16th Ave., was once a trailer park. The property was developed by Atlanta, Georgia-based Wood Partners in 2013. The transaction was completed with a $38.7 million mortgage provided by CBRE Capital Markets. Advenir, founded in 1996, has a portfolio of roughly 7,400 units located throughout the U.S. and valued at $550 million.

    ReplyDelete