Monday, August 22, 2016

Budget Poll- Recreation Department

 
Budget Season is Here! The first workshop on the proposed new budget was held last Wednesday with the second meeting coming up this Wednesday @ 7:30pm. Please attend if you can and make your thoughts known.
 
I have been communicating with several of our Commissioners due to the unique situation we find ourselves in of setting a budget now without the benefit of the audited financials from the previous year. Why this is a concern is that we still do not have the final confirmation of the overages we encountered in completing the two new buildings. As a brief recap, the admitted cost disclosed in the closing reconciliation was $1,800,147.24. However, closer inspection found that an additional $161,216.00 (less unexpected credits not known at the time of expenditure) were incurred using unappropriated Village funds. I assume this came from our reserves, but won’t fully know until after the audit has been completed. And that’s a problem, both then and now.
CNBC contributors laid out why they believe that a downturn or “reset” may be looming. “The truth is the economy is most likely already in a recession and there never was a viable economic recovery.”
So, I have advised caution moving forward and to prioritize spending for departments based on those that have the most direct benefit to the majority of our homeowners and in their overall impact to our property values, etc. Due to the fact we were unsuccessful in our efforts to add to or diversify our tax base, I am of the opinion that we need to do everything within our power to increase our home values and our investment in them. This brings me to our Code and Recreation departments.  

CODE:
Previous budgets committed as little as just 3% of our overall budget to our code department. And this under allocation of resources shows in the condition of our Village as there are issues on most every street that have gone unattended. Part of the problem has been a lack of support, training and oversight for our code officer. Part of it also is the possibility that the design of the department is just not efficient and as a result is too time consuming causing the code officer to spend approx. 90% of his time in the office… not out in the field where he is most needed.
But there is some good news. First, our new Manager’s background has been based in code and that should provide a major boost in every way imaginable. Secondly, there has been more money proposed in the new budget to provide for a part-time assistant to help with the paperwork and provide additional support. So, in my opinion, the message that we residents have been sending to the Commission has been heard and they are attempting to address it. Kudos.
RECREATION DEPARTMENT:
This department has been a hot topic for years. There have been many residents who have questioned both the use and design of this department. The main question seems to be “who” is using the park… our residents or others? There was a rather halfhearted attempt to gather this information in the past, but the results proved unreliable. Some years ago we successfully outsourced the after school and summer camp programs. Residents have questioned why not complete that measure by outsourcing the rest?
As such I thought now would be the time to gather input from our homeowners regarding specifically the Rec. Centers costs and its use. The new proposed budget for the departments employees is $84,979.00 in salaries + $20,881.00 in benefits =$105,860.00 in total.  As with any budget, there is only so much money to go around and again due to our unknown fiscal condition and reserves amount, we need to insure that we get the most bang for every tax dollar spent. Would you rather see the expenditure of $105,860.00 used for other purposes that may better benefit a larger number of our residents? I.e. additional street lighting, etc.
The purpose of the poll is to discover what number of our residents are actually using the rec. center services provided by our employees? (the poll question is located on the top right hand corner of the page)
POLL QUESTION:

·        Do you use the Rec. Center services provided by our employees?
·        Do you think that staffing it with our employees makes any difference in our property values or quality of life?  
Request- please limit your vote to one vote per household. The results should represent our property parcels and not our total overall population. Thanks-
Due to some limitations on how this site deals with polls, I am going to attempt to pose these two questions that will result with the same answer, either yes or no. However, if you agree with one point but not the other, please post your comments below with a brief explanation.
The more residents that participate, the better the statistical results will be.
This type of community involvement may perhaps assist our Commission with dealing with the new budget prior to it being finalized.
 
Standing Watch,
Milton Hunter
The Biscayne Parker





26 comments:

  1. All,
    As mentioned above, there are limitation with this site regarding the allowance of space in their poll section. @%$@#*^&)*!!

    The main question and data we're looking for should be: "Do you think it makes a difference to our quality-of-life, property values, or the overall Rec. Center experience if we have Biscayne Park employees versus an outside company managing the Rec Center?"

    With this in mind, please vote!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Milt, if you compare $103,825 for the 15-16 budget to $105,860 for the 16-17 budget it's a 2% increase, not 11%. You must be using the estimated actual numbers of $96,701 but that's still only 9.5%? I'll try to find out why we are estimating to be under budget on Payroll for this year.
    Before we answer the question about outsourcing I would need more info.

    Chuck

    ReplyDelete
  3. We do not use the Rec center. It does not improve quality of life. Property values. It should be private. And not a cost to our community. Not Biscayne park employees. Who pays the bill for our employers to cut the grass at the church's parking lot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Virginia,
      Thanks for your comment and I'll assume vote.
      Cheers-

      Delete
  4. Do you use the Rec. Center services provided by our employees? To some limited extent, but I support there being viable recreation services in the Village.

    Do you think that staffing it with our employees makes any difference in our property values or quality of life? The availability of good recreation services is undoubtedly an asset to a high quality community. It really is not an issue of who provides the service. Not everything should be provided based on a fee for service.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Milt,

    What are some alternatives to staffing the rec center ourselves? Would we rent it out to other community groups? How would that work (roughly)?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi bcp,

      I respectfully ask for you to (in future) use your full name as our blog policy does not allow for pseudonyms. It just potentially causes needless confusion for our readers. Thanks.
      As to your question, I'm not sure that now is the time for further discussion on the options. The main point was to get a gauge from our homeowners on both the cost and use of the rec. center as we do not have that information presently. If you haven't done so already, please make sure to vote. If this discussion receives any further consideration, I'm sure then we can move into more details as to how to both provide services, while at the same time cutting or redirecting costs.

      Delete
  6. We don't use the recreation center,it does not improve quality of life or property value.Don't agree with an outside company managing the recreation center.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi I don't use the rec center, but I think it would improve the quality of life if it were run by Biscayne Park. Would it increase property values? Yes, if it was maintained well and provided services that BP residents needed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Elona,

      Good to hear from you. That's an interesting idea regarding our property values... could you elaborate on what kind of services you have in mind that we need that couldn't be run by an outside vendor?

      I mean, we're doing that now already with the privatization of the after school and summer camp programs. We also have various outside vendors offering classes that are not Village employees nor on the payroll.

      So with that said, I'm curious as to what added value you perceive we gain versus the costs?

      Thanks-

      Delete
  8. Hi there, My husband and I do not use the rec center as it offers nothing for grown adults without children and the center is filled with non- residents at prime park times. I'd love to see the park privatized (although I've heard from community leaders that BP receives outside money from Miami-Dade therefore it cannot be privatized) , for tax paying residents to enjoy where our money goes, not for neighnboring communities to drive into our neighborhood to use our amenities. I'd love to see adult-friendly activies such as tennis courts, exercise stations as well as utilizing the indoor space for scheduled fitness classes, bridge and other activities for all age groups.
    I don't think Biscayne Park running the park makes any difference to the residents, nor does it increase our quality of life in the park. If we can hire an outside company to manage and run the facility for somewhat less than what we are currently paying or if we can get more services provided from the outside company for the same price as we are paying, than I'm for that.
    The park has always been a hot button and it seems over the years, nothing has changed which is frustrating as a resident!
    With that being said, I would not like to see $106,000 used towards street lighting but towards getting our exisiting park in better condition and getting used by more residents. $106,000 goes towards salaries and benefits howevever, this is not factoring in the cost to maintain the park that majority of residents are not using.
    Glad you're bringing this up! Thanks, Milton.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi there to you too Nicole,
      Thanks for your comments, opinions and Welcome to the blog! I appreciate your participation on this topic.

      One note- I'm not sure that we have any restrictions with bringing in any outside vendor(s) to manage what's left of the rec. center. I think you're referring to closing or restricting use of the park... which is not the subject. At least that's my take on it.

      Best~

      Delete
  9. Several years ago Biscayne Park ran its own summer camp and after school program. There were few resident kids and the budget was about 300,000, if I remember correctly. The Recreation Advisory Board, chaired by Rox Ross, not a commissioner at the time, recommended to the commission that we should outsource this service. Now Golden Gates runs the summer and after school program. We provide a service to our residents without paying for staff and actually get money from Golden Gates for the use of our facility. To me it's a good solution.

    In the new budget there's $84,979, for salaries, allocated for a Recreation Manager, 2 PT Coordinators and a summer Coordinator. The only program that we seem to be in charge of is a Lego group that meets once a month for 2 1/4 hrs. We do have several special events. The building is open from 10 - 7 M-S and Noon -7 on Sunday. Do we need the building open that much when kids are in school?

    I think having a recreation center, playground and well maintained playing field is important and a benefit to our community. I also think it's important to look carefully at how we're spending our money and getting the most out of every dollar. When we're outsourcing after school and summer camp I think we should look at the need for this level of staffing. Let's get a little more creative and a little more frugal. I would like to see us improve our medians, street lighting and maybe even add some adult exercise equipment or vita course in the park. We can't keep spending without thinking.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Morning Barbara,
    Good points, all. You know, at some point we need to get out of the mindset that just because we have done things a certain way in the past doesn't mean that we are forever bound to having to continue as all life changes and evolves over time. Our basis plan for providing services is now over 80 years old!

    Yes, we've tweaked things here and there (mostly by necessity)- but still seem reluctant to jump in with both feet and really analyze spending regarding in-house services and their costs vs. rewards. We seem to fall back to statue quo as familiarity seems to breed comfort. This I thinks speaks to the desire of being reactive or proactive in planning. Which is a discussion all its own.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hi Milt, forgive me for chiming in again, but I have a little more to say.

    A well run recreation program and facility is undoubtedly an asset to any community. However, it is not the "who" (Village employees vs. outsourcing), but the what is being produced.

    The first step is to decide what is desired and would be used by residents. If we have what is needed now, then the cost of that through in-house staff can be weighed against outsourcing. If we don't think we yet have a program that works for the community, then we need to determine that first. The outsourcing of events that we currently produce could be outsourced. More could be as well if we can adequately define the desired product. The management of any outsourced recreational services still needs to be done by Village employees based on specifications, benchmarks and outcomes, and at some cost. You shouldn't let out a contract for services without knowing what you are buying and without making sure you get what you contracted for. So if we define what we want and the necessary in house management can be built into the Villages' management structure, and all of that ends up being cheaper overall, then outsourcing can work and provide the desired asset value to the community.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Dan,
      Please... chime in as often as you like. We're looking for community input here so thanks.
      You touched on good points, some that others have also previously mentioned. Namely, what possible services are "wants or needs" for our residents? Personally, other than walking around the block and/or attending meetings there (more in the past than now)- I don't use the park or rec. center. Other adults seem to be saying the same thing too.

      However, I know we offer (through outside vendors) yoga, martial arts/ self-protection and some what, Irish dancing classes, etc. - but don't know how well they're attended. You know me in that I look more to our fiscal condition and bottom line... just wanted to try to gather some data in an effort to assist the Commission and gauge how we all feel about the expenditures.

      Delete
  12. I like to see people of Biscayne park working in our community since they will have more interes and knowledge of what we need.
    I haven't see the rec. center and I want to take the yoga class they have so I hope the place looks nicer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Xuna and welcome-
      The yoga class is provided from an outside vendor and not a service of our employees. The Village gets a 30% split the fees earned by any vendors. I'm not sure you were aware of this from your comment.

      Delete
  13. It costs less and have more control by keeping in house

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Harvey,
      I'm not sure I understand your comment of that it cost less? Using a vendor for services will save money in salaries and benefits. So, how can it cost more?

      Delete
  14. I think that we should let Miami Shores parks & rec run our park & rec center as an 'annex' & in return our residents should be able to participate in their programs & use the aquatics center, etc!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Laura,
      Welcome! I'm not sure your idea is realistic. But I like your "out of the box thinking."
      More probably is having Golden Glades expand their service as they already handle the after school and the summer programs already. This is how we can create potential savings.

      Delete
  15. UPDATE: 8/30/16

    So far this thread has received 280 views, yet only 39 votes. I'm a little disappointed in that result. But a thank you for those homeowners that did vote and add their opinions and/or comments. Does this mean that we just don't care about how or where our tax dollars are spent?

    ReplyDelete
  16. UPDATE: 316 page views and 40 votes....?

    ReplyDelete